Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Home / Cubist Artists Were Particularly Inspired by Traditional Art From

Cubist Artists Were Particularly Inspired by Traditional Art From

Post a Comment

Early-20th-century avant-garde fine art motility

Not to be confused with QBism.

Cubism is an early-20th-century avant-garde fine art movement that revolutionized European painting and sculpture, and inspired related movements in music, literature and compages. In Cubist artwork, objects are analyzed, broken up and reassembled in an abstracted form—instead of depicting objects from a single viewpoint, the artist depicts the subject area from a multitude of viewpoints to represent the subject in a greater context.[1] Cubism has been considered the most influential art movement of the 20th century.[2] [3] The term is broadly used in association with a broad diverseness of art produced in Paris (Montmartre and Montparnasse) or near Paris (Puteaux) during the 1910s and throughout the 1920s.

The movement was pioneered by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque, and joined by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay, Henri Le Fauconnier, Juan Gris, and Fernand Léger.[4] 1 primary influence that led to Cubism was the representation of three-dimensional form in the late works of Paul Cézanne.[v] A retrospective of Cézanne'due south paintings had been held at the Salon d'Automne of 1904, current works were displayed at the 1905 and 1906 Salon d'Automne, followed by two commemorative retrospectives later his death in 1907.[half dozen]

In France, offshoots of Cubism developed, including Orphism, abstruse art and afterward Purism.[7] [8] The impact of Cubism was far-reaching and wide-ranging. In France and other countries Futurism, Suprematism, Dada, Constructivism, Vorticism, De Stijl and Art Deco adult in response to Cubism. Early Futurist paintings hold in common with Cubism the fusing of the past and the present, the representation of different views of the subject pictured at the same time or successively, also called multiple perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity,[9] while Constructivism was influenced by Picasso's technique of constructing sculpture from separate elements.[10] Other common threads between these disparate movements include the faceting or simplification of geometric forms, and the association of mechanization and modern life.

History [edit]

Historians have divided the history of Cubism into phases. In one scheme, the outset phase of Cubism, known every bit Analytic Cubism, a phrase coined by Juan Gris a posteriori,[11] was both radical and influential as a short only highly significant art motility between 1910 and 1912 in France. A 2nd phase, Synthetic Cubism, remained vital until around 1919, when the Surrealist movement gained popularity. English art historian Douglas Cooper proposed another scheme, describing 3 phases of Cubism in his book, The Cubist Epoch. According to Cooper in that location was "Early Cubism", (from 1906 to 1908) when the movement was initially developed in the studios of Picasso and Braque; the 2d phase being called "High Cubism", (from 1909 to 1914) during which time Juan Gris emerged as an important exponent (subsequently 1911); and finally Cooper referred to "Late Cubism" (from 1914 to 1921) equally the last phase of Cubism every bit a radical avant-garde movement.[12] Douglas Cooper'southward restrictive use of these terms to distinguish the work of Braque, Picasso, Gris (from 1911) and Léger (to a lesser extent) implied an intentional value judgement.[5]

Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Effigy dans united nations Fauteuil (Seated Nude, Femme nue assise), oil on canvass, 92.1 × 73 cm, Tate Modern, London

Proto-Cubism: 1907–1908 [edit]

Cubism burgeoned between 1907 and 1911. Pablo Picasso'southward 1907 painting Les Demoiselles d'Avignon has often been considered a proto-Cubist work.

In 1908, in his review of Georges Braque's exhibition at Kahnweiler's gallery, the critic Louis Vauxcelles chosen Braque a daring human being who despises form, "reducing everything, places and a figures and houses, to geometric schemas, to cubes".[fourteen] [xv]

Vauxcelles recounted how Matisse told him at the time, "Braque has just sent in [to the 1908 Salon d'Automne] a painting made of footling cubes".[15] The critic Charles Morice relayed Matisse's words and spoke of Braque'southward little cubes. The motif of the viaduct at 50'Estaque had inspired Braque to produce three paintings marked by the simplification of grade and deconstruction of perspective.[16]

Georges Braque's 1908 Houses at L'Estaque (and related works) prompted Vauxcelles, in Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, to refer to bizarreries cubiques (cubic oddities).[17] Gertrude Stein referred to landscapes fabricated past Picasso in 1909, such as Reservoir at Horta de Ebro, equally the starting time Cubist paintings. The commencement organized group exhibition by Cubists took place at the Salon des Indépendants in Paris during the spring of 1911 in a room chosen 'Salle 41'; it included works by Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Fernand Léger, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, yet no works by Picasso or Braque were exhibited.[five]

By 1911 Picasso was recognized as the inventor of Cubism, while Braque'southward importance and precedence was argued later, with respect to his treatment of space, volume and mass in the L'Estaque landscapes. Just "this view of Cubism is associated with a distinctly restrictive definition of which artists are properly to be called Cubists," wrote the art historian Christopher Dark-green: "Marginalizing the contribution of the artists who exhibited at the Salon des Indépendants in 1911 [...]"[five]

The assertion that the Cubist depiction of space, mass, time, and book supports (rather than contradicts) the flatness of the sheet was made by Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler as early on equally 1920,[18] but it was bailiwick to criticism in the 1950s and 1960s, especially by Clement Greenberg.[19]

Gimmicky views of Cubism are complex, formed to some extent in response to the "Salle 41" Cubists, whose methods were as well distinct from those of Picasso and Braque to be considered just secondary to them. Alternative interpretations of Cubism take therefore developed. Wider views of Cubism include artists who were later associated with the "Salle 41" artists, e.g., Francis Picabia; the brothers Jacques Villon, Raymond Duchamp-Villon and Marcel Duchamp, who beginning in late 1911 formed the core of the Section d'Or (or the Puteaux Group); the sculptors Alexander Archipenko, Joseph Csaky and Ossip Zadkine as well every bit Jacques Lipchitz and Henri Laurens; and painters such equally Louis Marcoussis, Roger de La Fresnaye, František Kupka, Diego Rivera, Léopold Survage, Auguste Herbin, André Lhote, Gino Severini (after 1916), María Blanchard (after 1916) and Georges Valmier (after 1918). More fundamentally, Christopher Green argues that Douglas Cooper'due south terms were "later undermined by interpretations of the piece of work of Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger that stress iconographic and ideological questions rather than methods of representation."[5]

John Berger identifies the essence of Cubism with the mechanical diagram. "The metaphorical model of Cubism is the diagram: The diagram existence a visible symbolic representation of invisible processes, forces, structures. A diagram need not eschew certain aspects of appearance merely these too volition exist treated as signs not as imitations or recreations."[20]

Early Cubism: 1909–1914 [edit]

Albert Gleizes, 50'Homme au Balcon, Human being on a Balcony (Portrait of Dr. Théo Morinaud), 1912, oil on sheet, 195.6 × 114.nine cm (77 × 45 1/four in.), Philadelphia Museum of Fine art. Completed the aforementioned yr that Albert Gleizes co-authored the book Du "Cubisme" with Jean Metzinger. Exhibited at Salon d'Automne, Paris, 1912, Armory show, New York, Chicago, Boston, 1913

In that location was a singled-out departure between Kahnweiler's Cubists and the Salon Cubists. Prior to 1914, Picasso, Braque, Gris and Léger (to a bottom extent) gained the support of a single committed art dealer in Paris, Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler, who guaranteed them an almanac income for the sectional correct to buy their works. Kahnweiler sold only to a pocket-sized circle of connoisseurs. His support gave his artists the freedom to experiment in relative privacy. Picasso worked in Montmartre until 1912, while Braque and Gris remained there until afterwards the Offset Earth State of war. Léger was based in Montparnasse.[5]

In contrast, the Salon Cubists built their reputation primarily by exhibiting regularly at the Salon d'Automne and the Salon des Indépendants, both major non-academic Salons in Paris. They were inevitably more aware of public response and the need to communicate.[5] Already in 1910 a group began to class which included Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay and Léger. They met regularly at Henri le Fauconnier's studio near the boulevard du Montparnasse. These soirées ofttimes included writers such as Guillaume Apollinaire and André Salmon. Together with other immature artists, the group wanted to emphasise a research into form, in opposition to the Neo-Impressionist emphasis on color.[21]

Louis Vauxcelles, in his review of the 26th Salon des Indépendants (1910), made a passing and imprecise reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Léger and Le Fauconnier as "ignorant geometers, reducing the human body, the site, to pallid cubes."[22] [23] At the 1910 Salon d'Automne, a few months later, Metzinger exhibited his highly fractured Nu à la cheminée (Nude), which was afterwards reproduced in both Du "Cubisme" (1912) and Les Peintres Cubistes (1913).[24]

The outset public controversy generated by Cubism resulted from Salon showings at the Indépendants during the leap of 1911. This showing by Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, le Fauconnier and Léger brought Cubism to the attention of the general public for the first time. Amongst the Cubist works presented, Robert Delaunay exhibited his Eiffel Tower, Bout Eiffel (Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York).[25]

The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, October 8, 1911. Picasso's 1908 Seated Adult female (Meditation) is reproduced along with a photograph of the creative person in his studio (upper left). Metzinger's Baigneuses (1908–09) is reproduced acme correct. Also reproduced are works by Derain, Matisse, Friesz, Herbin, and a photograph of Braque

At the Salon d'Automne of the same yr, in improver to the Indépendants group of Salle 41, were exhibited works by André Lhote, Marcel Duchamp, Jacques Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye, André Dunoyer de Segonzac and František Kupka. The exhibition was reviewed in the Oct 8, 1911 outcome of The New York Times. This commodity was published a year after Gelett Burgess' The Wild Men of Paris,[26] and 2 years prior to the Arsenal Testify, which introduced astonished Americans, accustomed to realistic art, to the experimental styles of the European avant garde, including Fauvism, Cubism, and Futurism. The 1911 New York Times article portrayed works by Picasso, Matisse, Derain, Metzinger and others dated before 1909; not exhibited at the 1911 Salon. The article was titled The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Autumn Salon and subtitled Eccentric School of Painting Increases Its Vogue in the Current Art Exhibition – What Its Followers Attempt to Practise. [27] [28]

Among all the paintings on exhibition at the Paris Fall Salon none is alluring then much attention every bit the boggling productions of the so-called "Cubist" school. In fact, dispatches from Paris advise that these works are hands the main characteristic of the exhibition. [...]

In spite of the crazy nature of the "Cubist" theories the number of those professing them is adequately respectable. Georges Braque, André Derain, Picasso, Czobel, Othon Friesz, Herbin, Metzinger—these are a few of the names signed to canvases before which Paris has stood and now again stands in blank amazement.

What do they mean? Have those responsible for them taken leave of their senses? Is it art or madness? Who knows?[27] [28]

Salon des Indépendants [edit]

The subsequent 1912 Salon des Indépendants located in Paris (xx March to 16 May 1912) was marked by the presentation of Marcel Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2, which itself acquired a scandal, even amongst the Cubists. Information technology was in fact rejected past the hanging committee, which included his brothers and other Cubists. Although the work was shown in the Salon de la Department d'Or in October 1912 and the 1913 Armory Evidence in New York, Duchamp never forgave his brothers and old colleagues for censoring his work.[21] [29] Juan Gris, a new add-on to the Salon scene, exhibited his Portrait of Picasso (Art Plant of Chicago), while Metzinger's 2 showings included La Femme au Cheval (Woman with a horse) 1911–1912 (National Gallery of Denmark).[30] Delaunay's awe-inspiring La Ville de Paris (Musée d'art moderne de la Ville de Paris) and Léger'due south La Noce, The Wedding (Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris), were also exhibited.

Galeries Dalmau [edit]

In 1912, Galeries Dalmau presented the first declared group exhibition of Cubism worldwide (Exposició d'Art Cubista),[31] [32] [33] with a controversial showing past Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Juan Gris, Marie Laurencin and Marcel Duchamp (Barcelona, 20 Apr to 10 May 1912). The Dalmau exhibition comprised 83 works past 26 artists.[34] [35] [36] Jacques Nayral'due south association with Gleizes led him to write the Preface for the Cubist exhibition,[31] which was fully translated and reproduced in the newspaper La Veu de Catalunya.[37] [38] Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 was exhibited for the commencement time.[39]

Extensive media coverage (in newspapers and magazines) before, during and after the exhibition launched the Galeries Dalmau equally a force in the development and propagation of modernism in Europe.[39] While press coverage was extensive, information technology was non always positive. Articles were published in the newspapers Esquella de La Torratxa [40] and El Noticiero Universal [41] attacking the Cubists with a serial of caricatures laced with derogatory text.[41] Art historian Jaime Brihuega writes of the Dalmau show: "No dubiety that the exhibition produced a strong commotion in the public, who welcomed it with a lot of suspicion.[42]

Salon d'Automne [edit]

The Cubist contribution to the 1912 Salon d'Automne created scandal regarding the use of government owned buildings, such as the K Palais, to exhibit such artwork. The indignation of the political leader Jean Pierre Philippe Lampué made the front page of Le Journal, 5 Oct 1912.[43] The controversy spread to the Municipal Council of Paris, leading to a contend in the Chambre des Députés about the use of public funds to provide the venue for such fine art.[44] The Cubists were defended by the Socialist deputy, Marcel Sembat.[44] [45] [46]

Information technology was confronting this background of public anger that Jean Metzinger and Albert Gleizes wrote Du "Cubisme" (published by Eugène Figuière in 1912, translated to English language and Russian in 1913).[47] Among the works exhibited were Le Fauconnier's vast composition Les Montagnards attaqués par des ours (Mountaineers Attacked by Bears) now at Rhode Island School of Design Museum, Joseph Csaky'southward Deux Femme, Ii Women (a sculpture now lost), in improver to the highly abstract paintings by Kupka, Amorpha (The National Gallery, Prague), and Picabia, La Source (The Bound) (Museum of Modern Art, New York).

Abstraction and the prepare-made [edit]

The nearly extreme forms of Cubism were not those practiced by Picasso and Braque, who resisted total abstraction. Other Cubists, by contrast, especially František Kupka, and those considered Orphists by Apollinaire (Delaunay, Léger, Picabia and Duchamp), accepted brainchild by removing visible subject area matter entirely. Kupka's two entries at the 1912 Salon d'Automne, Amorpha-Fugue à deux couleurs and Amorpha chromatique chaude, were highly abstract (or nonrepresentational) and metaphysical in orientation. Both Duchamp in 1912 and Picabia from 1912 to 1914 developed an expressive and allusive abstraction dedicated to complex emotional and sexual themes. Beginning in 1912 Delaunay painted a serial of paintings entitled Simultaneous Windows, followed by a series entitled Formes Circulaires, in which he combined planar structures with bright prismatic hues; based on the optical characteristics of juxtaposed colors his departure from reality in the depiction of imagery was quasi-complete. In 1913–xiv Léger produced a series entitled Contrasts of Forms, giving a similar stress to color, line and form. His Cubism, despite its abstruse qualities, was associated with themes of mechanization and modernistic life. Apollinaire supported these early developments of abstract Cubism in Les Peintres cubistes (1913),[24] writing of a new "pure" painting in which the subject field was vacated. Only in spite of his use of the term Orphism these works were so different that they defy attempts to place them in a single category.[v]

As well labeled an Orphist past Apollinaire, Marcel Duchamp was responsible for some other farthermost development inspired by Cubism. The ready-made arose from a joint consideration that the piece of work itself is considered an object (just as a painting), and that it uses the material detritus of the world (as collage and papier collé in the Cubist structure and Assemblage). The next logical step, for Duchamp, was to present an ordinary object as a cocky-sufficient work of art representing only itself. In 1913 he fastened a bicycle cycle to a kitchen stool and in 1914 selected a canteen-drying rack as a sculpture in its own right.[5]

Department d'Or [edit]

The Section d'Or, likewise known equally Groupe de Puteaux, founded past some of the well-nigh conspicuous Cubists, was a collective of painters, sculptors and critics associated with Cubism and Orphism, active from 1911 through well-nigh 1914, coming to prominence in the wake of their controversial showing at the 1911 Salon des Indépendants. The Salon de la Department d'Or at the Galerie La Boétie in Paris, October 1912, was arguably the most of import pre-World War I Cubist exhibition; exposing Cubism to a broad audience. Over 200 works were displayed, and the fact that many of the artists showed artworks representative of their development from 1909 to 1912 gave the exhibition the allure of a Cubist retrospective.[48]

The group seems to take adopted the proper noun Section d'Or to distinguish themselves from the narrower definition of Cubism developed in parallel by Pablo Picasso and Georges Braque in the Montmartre quarter of Paris, and to prove that Cubism, rather than being an isolated fine art-grade, represented the continuation of a grand tradition (indeed, the aureate ratio had fascinated Western intellectuals of various interests for at to the lowest degree ii,400 years).[49]

The idea of the Department d'Or originated in the form of conversations betwixt Metzinger, Gleizes and Jacques Villon. The group'southward title was suggested past Villon, after reading a 1910 translation of Leonardo da Vinci's Trattato della Pittura by Joséphin Péladan.

During the late 19th and early on 20th centuries, Europeans were discovering African, Polynesian, Micronesian and Native American art. Artists such equally Paul Gauguin, Henri Matisse, and Pablo Picasso were intrigued and inspired past the stark power and simplicity of styles of those foreign cultures. Around 1906, Picasso met Matisse through Gertrude Stein, at a time when both artists had recently acquired an involvement in primitivism, Iberian sculpture, African art and African tribal masks. They became friendly rivals and competed with each other throughout their careers, mayhap leading to Picasso inbound a new flow in his piece of work by 1907, marked by the influence of Greek, Iberian and African fine art. Picasso'due south paintings of 1907 accept been characterized as Protocubism, as notably seen in Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, the antecedent of Cubism.[xiii]

The art historian Douglas Cooper states that Paul Gauguin and Paul Cézanne "were particularly influential to the formation of Cubism and peculiarly of import to the paintings of Picasso during 1906 and 1907".[50] Cooper goes on to say: "The Demoiselles is by and large referred to as the first Cubist picture. This is an exaggeration, for although it was a major first pace towards Cubism it is not all the same Cubist. The disruptive, expressionist element in information technology is even reverse to the spirit of Cubism, which looked at the world in a detached, realistic spirit. However, the Demoiselles is the logical picture to take as the starting point for Cubism, because it marks the nascence of a new pictorial idiom, because in it Picasso violently overturned established conventions and considering all that followed grew out of it."[13]

The most serious objection to regarding the Demoiselles as the origin of Cubism, with its evident influence of primitive art, is that "such deductions are unhistorical", wrote the art historian Daniel Robbins. This familiar explanation "fails to requite adequate consideration to the complexities of a flourishing fine art that existed just before and during the menstruum when Picasso's new painting developed."[51] Betwixt 1905 and 1908, a conscious search for a new style caused rapid changes in art across France, Germany, The Netherlands, Italy, and Russia. The Impressionists had used a double point of view, and both Les Nabis and the Symbolists (who as well admired Cézanne) flattened the moving picture airplane, reducing their subjects to simple geometric forms. Neo-Impressionist construction and subject matter, most notably to be seen in the works of Georges Seurat (e.m., Parade de Cirque, Le Chahut and Le Cirque), was another important influence. There were too parallels in the development of literature and social thought.[51]

In addition to Seurat, the roots of cubism are to be found in the two singled-out tendencies of Cézanne's later work: first his breaking of the painted surface into small multifaceted areas of pigment, thereby emphasizing the plural viewpoint given by binocular vision, and second his interest in the simplification of natural forms into cylinders, spheres, and cones. All the same, the cubists explored this concept farther than Cézanne. They represented all the surfaces of depicted objects in a unmarried picture airplane, as if the objects had all their faces visible at the same time. This new kind of depiction revolutionized the mode objects could exist visualized in painting and art.

The historical report of Cubism began in the tardily 1920s, drawing at kickoff from sources of limited data, namely the opinions of Guillaume Apollinaire. Information technology came to rely heavily on Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler's book Der Weg zum Kubismus (published in 1920), which centered on the developments of Picasso, Braque, Léger, and Gris. The terms "belittling" and "constructed" which later on emerged have been widely accepted since the mid-1930s. Both terms are historical impositions that occurred after the facts they identify. Neither phase was designated every bit such at the time corresponding works were created. "If Kahnweiler considers Cubism as Picasso and Braque," wrote Daniel Robbins, "our only fault is in subjecting other Cubists' works to the rigors of that limited definition."[51]

The traditional interpretation of "Cubism", formulated mail facto as a ways of understanding the works of Braque and Picasso, has affected our appreciation of other twentieth-century artists. It is difficult to use to painters such equally Jean Metzinger, Albert Gleizes, Robert Delaunay and Henri Le Fauconnier, whose fundamental differences from traditional Cubism compelled Kahnweiler to question whether to call them Cubists at all. Co-ordinate to Daniel Robbins, "To advise that just because these artists developed differently or varied from the traditional pattern they deserved to be relegated to a secondary or satellite part in Cubism is a profound error."[51]

The history of the term "Cubism" usually stresses the fact that Matisse referred to "cubes" in connexion with a painting by Braque in 1908, and that the term was published twice past the critic Louis Vauxcelles in a like context. Withal, the word "cube" was used in 1906 by some other critic, Louis Chassevent, with reference not to Picasso or Braque but rather to Metzinger and Delaunay:

"Yard. Metzinger is a mosaicist similar M. Signac but he brings more precision to the cut of his cubes of color which appear to have been fabricated mechanically [...]".[51] [52] [53]

The critical utilize of the word "cube" goes dorsum at least to May 1901 when Jean Béral, reviewing the piece of work of Henri-Edmond Cross at the Indépendants in Art et Littérature, commented that he "uses a large and square pointillism, giving the impression of mosaic. One even wonders why the artist has not used cubes of solid matter diversely colored: they would make pretty revetments." (Robert Herbert, 1968, p. 221)[53]

The term Cubism did not come up into general usage until 1911, mainly with reference to Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, and Léger.[51] In 1911, the poet and critic Guillaume Apollinaire accepted the term on behalf of a grouping of artists invited to exhibit at the Brussels Indépendants. The post-obit year, in preparation for the Salon de la Section d'Or, Metzinger and Gleizes wrote and published Du "Cubisme" [54] in an effort to dispel the confusion raging around the discussion, and as a major defense force of Cubism (which had acquired a public scandal following the 1911 Salon des Indépendants and the 1912 Salon d'Automne in Paris).[55] Clarifying their aims as artists, this work was the start theoretical treatise on Cubism and information technology however remains the clearest and most intelligible. The result, non solely a collaboration between its two authors, reflected discussions by the circle of artists who met in Puteaux and Courbevoie. It mirrored the attitudes of the "artists of Passy", which included Picabia and the Duchamp brothers, to whom sections of it were read prior to publication.[5] [51] The concept developed in Du "Cubisme" of observing a discipline from different points in space and fourth dimension simultaneously, i.e., the deed of moving effectually an object to seize it from several successive angles fused into a unmarried image (multiple viewpoints, mobile perspective, simultaneity or multiplicity), is a by and large recognized device used by the Cubists.[56]

The 1912 manifesto Du "Cubisme" by Metzinger and Gleizes was followed in 1913 by Les Peintres Cubistes, a drove of reflections and commentaries by Guillaume Apollinaire.[24] Apollinaire had been closely involved with Picasso starting time in 1905, and Braque get-go in 1907, but gave as much attention to artists such as Metzinger, Gleizes, Delaunay, Picabia, and Duchamp.[5]

The fact that the 1912 exhibition had been curated to show the successive stages through which Cubism had transited, and that Du "Cubisme" had been published for the occasion, indicates the artists' intention of making their work comprehensible to a wide audition (art critics, art collectors, fine art dealers and the general public). Undoubtedly, due to the great success of the exhibition, Cubism became avant-garde movement recognized as a genre or style in art with a specific common philosophy or goal.[48]

Crystal Cubism: 1914–1918 [edit]

A significant modification of Cubism between 1914 and 1916 was signaled by a shift towards a potent emphasis on large overlapping geometric planes and flat surface activity. This grouping of styles of painting and sculpture, peculiarly significant between 1917 and 1920, was practiced by several artists; particularly those under contract with the art dealer and collector Léonce Rosenberg. The tightening of the compositions, the clarity and sense of order reflected in these works, led to its being referred to past the critic Maurice Raynal equally 'crystal' Cubism. Considerations manifested by Cubists prior to the outset of World War I—such as the time, dynamism of modernistic life, the occult, and Henri Bergson'due south concept of elapsing—had now been vacated, replaced by a purely formal frame of reference.[57]

Crystal Cubism, and its associative rappel à l'ordre, has been linked with an inclination—past those who served the military machine and past those who remained in the civilian sector—to escape the realities of the Groovy War, both during and directly following the disharmonize. The purifying of Cubism from 1914 through the mid-1920s, with its cohesive unity and voluntary constraints, has been linked to a much broader ideological transformation towards conservatism in both French society and French culture.[5]

Cubism subsequently 1918 [edit]

The most innovative period of Cubism was earlier 1914[ citation needed ]. After World War I, with the support given past the dealer Léonce Rosenberg, Cubism returned as a central effect for artists, and continued as such until the mid-1920s when its advanced status was rendered questionable by the emergence of geometric brainchild and Surrealism in Paris. Many Cubists, including Picasso, Braque, Gris, Léger, Gleizes, and Metzinger, while developing other styles, returned periodically to Cubism, even well after 1925. Cubism reemerged during the 1920s and the 1930s in the piece of work of the American Stuart Davis and the Englishman Ben Nicholson. In French republic, however, Cubism experienced a decline outset in near 1925. Léonce Rosenberg exhibited not simply the artists stranded by Kahnweiler's exile simply others including Laurens, Lipchitz, Metzinger, Gleizes, Csaky, Herbin and Severini. In 1918 Rosenberg presented a series of Cubist exhibitions at his Galerie de fifty'Endeavour Moderne in Paris. Attempts were made by Louis Vauxcelles to argue that Cubism was dead, only these exhibitions, along with a well-organized Cubist show at the 1920 Salon des Indépendants and a revival of the Salon de la Section d'Or in the aforementioned twelvemonth, demonstrated information technology was nonetheless alive.[five]

The reemergence of Cubism coincided with the appearance from nearly 1917–24 of a coherent body of theoretical writing by Pierre Reverdy, Maurice Raynal and Daniel-Henry Kahnweiler and, amongst the artists, by Gris, Léger and Gleizes. The occasional return to classicism—figurative piece of work either exclusively or aslope Cubist work—experienced past many artists during this menstruation (called Neoclassicism) has been linked to the tendency to evade the realities of the war and also to the cultural potency of a classical or Latin image of France during and immediately following the war. Cubism after 1918 tin can exist seen as function of a wide ideological shift towards conservatism in both French order and culture. Yet, Cubism itself remained evolutionary both within the oeuvre of individual artists, such as Gris and Metzinger, and across the work of artists equally different from each other as Braque, Léger and Gleizes. Cubism as a publicly debated movement became relatively unified and open up to definition. Its theoretical purity made information technology a gauge against which such diverse tendencies every bit Realism or Naturalism, Dada, Surrealism and abstraction could be compared.[5]

Diego Rivera, Portrait de Messieurs Kawashima et Foujita, 1914

Influence in Asia [edit]

Japan and China were among the kickoff countries in Asia to be influenced by Cubism. Contact starting time occurred via European texts translated and published in Japanese art journals in the 1910s. In the 1920s, Japanese and Chinese artists who studied in Paris, for example those enrolled at the École nationale supérieure des Beaux-Arts, brought dorsum with them both an understanding of modern art movements, including Cubism. Notable works exhibiting Cubist qualities were Tetsugorō Yorozu's Self Portrait with Ruby Optics (1912) and Fang Ganmin's Melody in Fall (1934).[59] [60]

Estimation [edit]

Intentions and criticism [edit]

The Cubism of Picasso and Braque had more than a technical or formal significance, and the distinct attitudes and intentions of the Salon Cubists produced different kinds of Cubism, rather than a derivative of their piece of work. "It is by no ways clear, in any case," wrote Christopher Green, "to what extent these other Cubists depended on Picasso and Braque for their evolution of such techniques as faceting, 'passage' and multiple perspective; they could well have arrived at such practices with fiddling knowledge of 'true' Cubism in its early stages, guided above all by their own understanding of Cézanne." The works exhibited by these Cubists at the 1911 and 1912 Salons extended beyond the conventional Cézanne-like subjects—the posed model, nevertheless-life and landscape—favored by Picasso and Braque to include large-scale modern-life subjects. Aimed at a large public, these works stressed the employ of multiple perspective and complex planar faceting for expressive effect while preserving the eloquence of subjects endowed with literary and philosophical connotations.[5]

In Du "Cubisme" Metzinger and Gleizes explicitly related the sense of time to multiple perspective, giving symbolic expression to the notion of 'duration' proposed by the philosopher Henri Bergson according to which life is subjectively experienced as a continuum, with the past flowing into the nowadays and the present merging into the future. The Salon Cubists used the faceted treatment of solid and space and effects of multiple viewpoints to convey a physical and psychological sense of the fluidity of consciousness, blurring the distinctions between past, present and futurity. 1 of the major theoretical innovations made past the Salon Cubists, independently of Picasso and Braque, was that of simultaneity,[5] drawing to greater or lesser extent on theories of Henri Poincaré, Ernst Mach, Charles Henry, Maurice Princet, and Henri Bergson. With simultaneity, the concept of divide spatial and temporal dimensions was comprehensively challenged. Linear perspective developed during the Renaissance was vacated. The subject thing was no longer considered from a specific signal of view at a moment in fourth dimension, but congenital following a choice of successive viewpoints, i.eastward., equally if viewed simultaneously from numerous angles (and in multiple dimensions) with the center free to roam from one to the other.[56]

This technique of representing simultaneity, multiple viewpoints (or relative move) is pushed to a loftier degree of complexity in Metzinger's Nu à la cheminée, exhibited at the 1910 Salon d'Automne; Gleizes' monumental Le Dépiquage des Moissons (Harvest Threshing), exhibited at the 1912 Salon de la Department d'Or; Le Fauconnier'south Abundance shown at the Indépendants of 1911; and Delaunay's City of Paris, exhibited at the Indépendants in 1912. These ambitious works are some of the largest paintings in the history of Cubism. Léger's The Wedding, also shown at the Salon des Indépendants in 1912, gave form to the notion of simultaneity by presenting different motifs every bit occurring within a single temporal frame, where responses to the past and present interpenetrate with collective force. The conjunction of such discipline affair with simultaneity aligns Salon Cubism with early on Futurist paintings past Umberto Boccioni, Gino Severini and Carlo Carrà; themselves made in response to early on Cubism.[9]

Cubism and modern European art was introduced into the U.s. at the at present legendary 1913 Arsenal Evidence in New York Metropolis, which then traveled to Chicago and Boston. In the Armory bear witness Pablo Picasso exhibited La Femme au pot de moutarde (1910), the sculpture Head of a Woman (Fernande) (1909–x), Les Arbres (1907) amongst other cubist works. Jacques Villon exhibited vii important and large drypoints, while his brother Marcel Duchamp shocked the American public with his painting Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 (1912). Francis Picabia exhibited his abstractions La Danse à la source and La Procession, Seville (both of 1912). Albert Gleizes exhibited La Femme aux phlox (1910) and L'Homme au balcon (1912), 2 highly stylized and faceted cubist works. Georges Braque, Fernand Léger, Raymond Duchamp-Villon, Roger de La Fresnaye and Alexander Archipenko also contributed examples of their cubist works.

Cubist sculpture [edit]

Frontal view of the aforementioned statuary bandage, 40.5 × 23 × 26 cm

These photos were published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913[62]

But every bit in painting, Cubist sculpture is rooted in Paul Cézanne'due south reduction of painted objects into component planes and geometric solids (cubes, spheres, cylinders, and cones). And simply as in painting, it became a pervasive influence and contributed fundamentally to Constructivism and Futurism.

Cubist sculpture adult in parallel to Cubist painting. During the autumn of 1909 Picasso sculpted Head of a Woman (Fernande) with positive features depicted by negative space and vice versa. According to Douglas Cooper: "The offset true Cubist sculpture was Picasso's impressive Woman'south Head, modeled in 1909–10, a counterpart in iii dimensions to many like analytical and faceted heads in his paintings at the fourth dimension."[12] These positive/negative reversals were ambitiously exploited by Alexander Archipenko in 1912–13, for instance in Adult female Walking.[5] Joseph Csaky, later on Archipenko, was the start sculptor in Paris to join the Cubists, with whom he exhibited from 1911 onwards. They were followed by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and then in 1914 by Jacques Lipchitz, Henri Laurens and Ossip Zadkine.[63] [64]

Indeed, Cubist construction was as influential every bit any pictorial Cubist innovation. It was the stimulus behind the proto-Constructivist piece of work of both Naum Gabo and Vladimir Tatlin and thus the starting-point for the entire constructive tendency in 20th-century modernist sculpture.[five]

Architecture [edit]

Le Corbusier, Assembly building, Chandigarh, India

Cubism formed an important link between early-20th-century art and architecture.[65] The historical, theoretical, and socio-political relationships between avant-garde practices in painting, sculpture and architecture had early ramifications in France, Germany, holland and Czechoslovakia. Though there are many points of intersection between Cubism and compages, only a few direct links betwixt them can exist drawn. Most often the connections are made by reference to shared formal characteristics: faceting of form, spatial ambiguity, transparency, and multiplicity.[65]

Architectural involvement in Cubism centered on the dissolution and reconstitution of three-dimensional form, using simple geometric shapes, juxtaposed without the illusions of classical perspective. Diverse elements could exist superimposed, made transparent or penetrate one another, while retaining their spatial relationships. Cubism had become an influential factor in the development of modern architecture from 1912 (La Maison Cubiste, by Raymond Duchamp-Villon and André Mare) onwards, developing in parallel with architects such as Peter Behrens and Walter Gropius, with the simplification of building design, the use of materials appropriate to industrial production, and the increased use of glass.[66]

Cubism was relevant to an architecture seeking a style that needed not refer to the past. Thus, what had become a revolution in both painting and sculpture was applied as part of "a profound reorientation towards a changed globe".[66] [67] The Cubo-Futurist ideas of Filippo Tommaso Marinetti influenced attitudes in advanced architecture. The influential De Stijl motility embraced the aesthetic principles of Neo-plasticism developed past Piet Mondrian under the influence of Cubism in Paris. De Stijl was as well linked past Gino Severini to Cubist theory through the writings of Albert Gleizes. Even so, the linking of basic geometric forms with inherent dazzler and ease of industrial application—which had been prefigured by Marcel Duchamp from 1914—was left to the founders of Purism, Amédée Ozenfant and Charles-Édouard Jeanneret (improve known as Le Corbusier,) who exhibited paintings together in Paris and published Après le cubisme in 1918.[66] Le Corbusier'south appetite had been to interpret the properties of his own fashion of Cubism to architecture. Between 1918 and 1922, Le Corbusier concentrated his efforts on Purist theory and painting. In 1922, Le Corbusier and his cousin Jeanneret opened a studio in Paris at 35 rue de Sèvres. His theoretical studies soon avant-garde into many different architectural projects.[68]

La Maison Cubiste (Cubist House) [edit]

Raymond Duchamp-Villon, 1912, Study for La Maison Cubiste, Projet d'Hotel (Cubist House). Paradigm published in Les Peintres Cubistes, past Guillaume Apollinaire, 17 March 1913

Le Salon Bourgeois, designed past André Mare for La Maison Cubiste, in the decorative arts section of the Salon d'Automne, 1912, Paris. Metzinger'southward Femme à 50'Éventail on the left wall

At the 1912 Salon d'Automne an architectural installation was exhibited that speedily became known as Maison Cubiste (Cubist Firm), with architecture past Raymond Duchamp-Villon and interior ornamentation by André Mare along with a group of collaborators. Metzinger and Gleizes in Du "Cubisme", written during the assemblage of the "Maison Cubiste", wrote about the democratic nature of fine art, stressing the point that decorative considerations should not govern the spirit of art. Decorative work, to them, was the "antithesis of the picture". "The truthful pic" wrote Metzinger and Gleizes, "bears its raison d'être inside itself. It can be moved from a church to a drawing-room, from a museum to a study. Essentially contained, necessarily complete, it demand non immediately satisfy the mind: on the contrary, it should atomic number 82 information technology, little by picayune, towards the fictitious depths in which the coordinative light resides. It does not harmonize with this or that ensemble; it harmonizes with things in general, with the universe: it is an organism...".[69]

La Maison Cubiste was a fully furnished model house, with a facade, a staircase, wrought iron banisters, and ii rooms: a living room—the Salon Bourgeois, where paintings by Marcel Duchamp, Metzinger (Woman with a Fan), Gleizes, Laurencin and Léger were hung, and a bedroom. It was an example of Fifty'art décoratif, a abode inside which Cubist art could exist displayed in the comfort and style of modern, bourgeois life. Spectators at the Salon d'Automne passed through the plaster facade, designed past Duchamp-Villon, to the two furnished rooms.[lxx] This architectural installation was afterward exhibited at the 1913 Arsenal Show, New York, Chicago and Boston,[71] listed in the catalogue of the New York exhibit as Raymond Duchamp-Villon, number 609, and entitled "Facade architectural, plaster" (Façade architecturale).[72] [73]

Jacques Doucet'southward hôtel particulier, 33 rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine

The furnishings, wallpaper, upholstery and carpets of the interior were designed by André Mare, and were early on examples of the influence of cubism on what would get Art Deco. They were composed of very brightly colored roses and other floral patterns in stylized geometric forms.

Mare chosen the living room in which Cubist paintings were hung the Salon Conservative. Léger described this name as 'perfect'. In a alphabetic character to Mare prior to the exhibition Léger wrote: "Your idea is absolutely splendid for us, actually splendid. People will come across Cubism in its domestic setting, which is very important.[two]

"Mare'south ensembles were accepted as frames for Cubist works because they immune paintings and sculptures their independence", Christopher Greenish wrote, "creating a play of contrasts, hence the involvement non only of Gleizes and Metzinger themselves, but of Marie Laurencin, the Duchamp brothers (Raymond Duchamp-Villon designed the facade) and Mare'south old friends Léger and Roger La Fresnaye".[74]

In 1927, Cubists Joseph Csaky, Jacques Lipchitz, Louis Marcoussis, Henri Laurens, the sculptor Gustave Miklos, and others collaborated in the decoration of a Studio Firm, rue Saint-James, Neuilly-sur-Seine, designed by the architect Paul Ruaud and owned by the French fashion designer Jacques Doucet, also a collector of Mail service-Impressionist and Cubist paintings (including Les Demoiselles d'Avignon, which he bought direct from Picasso's studio). Laurens designed the fountain, Csaky designed Doucet's staircase,[75] Lipchitz fabricated the fireplace mantel, and Marcoussis made a Cubist rug.[76] [77] [78]

Czech Cubist compages [edit]

The original Cubist architecture is very rare. Cubism was applied to architecture simply in Bohemia (today Czechia) and specially in its capital, Prague.[79] [eighty] Czech architects were the first and only ones to ever design original Cubist buildings.[81] Cubist architecture flourished for the near part between 1910 and 1914, but the Cubist or Cubism-influenced buildings were likewise built after Earth War I. After the war, the architectural style chosen Rondo-Cubism was developed in Prague fusing the Cubist architecture with round shapes.[82]

In their theoretical rules, the Cubist architects expressed the requirement of dynamism, which would surmount the matter and calm contained in it, through a creative idea, and so that the upshot would evoke feelings of dynamism and expressive plasticity in the viewer. This should be achieved past shapes derived from pyramids, cubes and prisms, by arrangements and compositions of oblique surfaces, mainly triangular, sculpted facades in protruding crystal-like units, reminiscent of the so-called diamond cut, or even cavernous that are reminiscent of the late Gothic architecture. In this style, the unabridged surfaces of the facades including fifty-fifty the gables and dormers are sculpted. The grilles besides as other architectural ornaments attain a three-dimensional form. Thus, new forms of windows and doors were also created, east. one thousand. hexagonal windows.[82] Czech Cubist architects as well designed Cubist furniture.

The leading Cubist architects were Pavel Janák, Josef Gočár, Vlastislav Hofman, Emil Králíček and Josef Chochol.[82] They worked mostly in Prague but as well in other Bohemian towns. The best-known Cubist building is the House of the Black Madonna in the Former Town of Prague built in 1912 by Josef Gočár with the only Cubist café in the world, Grand Café Orient.[79] Vlastislav Hofman built the entrance pavilions of Ďáblice Cemetery in 1912–1914, Josef Chochol designed several residential houses under Vyšehrad. A Cubist streetlamp has also been preserved well-nigh the Wenceslas Square, designed by Emil Králíček in 1912, who also built the Diamond Business firm in the New Town of Prague effectually 1913.

Cubism in other fields [edit]

The influence of cubism extended to other artistic fields, exterior painting and sculpture. In literature, the written works of Gertrude Stein employ repetition and repetitive phrases equally building blocks in both passages and whole chapters. Well-nigh of Stein's important works utilize this technique, including the novel The Making of Americans (1906–08). Non only were they the commencement important patrons of Cubism, Gertrude Stein and her brother Leo were also important influences on Cubism as well. In plow, Picasso was an important influence on Stein's writing. In the field of American fiction, William Faulkner'south 1930 novel As I Lay Dying can be read equally an interaction with the cubist mode. The novel features narratives of the diverse experiences of xv characters which, when taken together, produce a single cohesive body.

The poets generally associated with Cubism are Guillaume Apollinaire, Blaise Cendrars, Jean Cocteau, Max Jacob, André Salmon and Pierre Reverdy. As American poet Kenneth Rexroth explains, Cubism in poetry "is the witting, deliberate dissociation and recombination of elements into a new artistic entity made self-sufficient past its rigorous architecture. This is quite unlike from the free association of the Surrealists and the combination of unconscious utterance and political nihilism of Dada."[83] Nonetheless, the Cubist poets' influence on both Cubism and the later movements of Dada and Surrealism was profound; Louis Aragon, founding fellow member of Surrealism, said that for Breton, Soupault, Éluard and himself, Reverdy was "our immediate elder, the exemplary poet."[84] Though non equally well remembered as the Cubist painters, these poets continue to influence and inspire; American poets John Ashbery and Ron Padgett have recently produced new translations of Reverdy'south work. Wallace Stevens' "13 Ways of Looking at a Blackbird" is as well said to demonstrate how cubism'due south multiple perspectives can be translated into poetry.[85]

John Berger said: "It is nigh impossible to exaggerate the importance of Cubism. It was a revolution in the visual arts as bang-up as that which took place in the early on Renaissance. Its effects on later fine art, on film, and on compages are already and so numerous that we hardly notice them."[86]

Gallery [edit]

  • Pablo Picasso, 1913–14, Femme assise dans united nations fauteuil (Eva), Woman in an Armchair, oil on canvas, 149.ix x 99.4 cm, Leonard A. Lauder Cubist Collection

  • Pablo Picasso, 1918, Arlequin au violon (Harlequin with Violin), oil on canvas, 142 x 100.iii cm, The Cleveland Museum of Art, Ohio

  • Gino Severini, 1919, Bohémien Jouant de L'Accordéon (The Accordion Actor), Museo del Novecento, Milan

Press manufactures and reviews [edit]

  • (center) Jean Metzinger, c.1913, Le Fumeur (Human with Pipe), Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh; (left) Alexander Archipenko, 1914, Danseuse du Médrano (Médrano II), (right) Archipenko, 1913, Pierrot-carrousel, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York. Published in Le Petit Comtois, xiii March 1914

  • Paintings by Fernand Léger, 1912, La Femme en Bleu, Woman in Blueish, Kunstmuseum Basel; Jean Metzinger, 1912, Dancer in a café, Albright-Knox Art Gallery; and sculpture by Alexander Archipenko, 1912, La Vie Familiale, Family Life (destroyed). Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, n. 1529, 13 October 1912

  • Paintings past Gino Severini, 1911, La Danse du Pan-Pan, and Severini, 1913, L'autobus. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste, 14 March 1920

  • Paintings by Gino Severini, 1911, Souvenirs de Voyage; Albert Gleizes, 1912, Homo on a Balustrade, L'Homme au balcon; Severini, 1912–13, Portrait de Mlle Jeanne Paul-Fort; Luigi Russolo, 1911–12, La Révolte. Published in "Les Annales politiques et littéraires", Le Paradoxe Cubiste (continued), n. 1916, fourteen March 1920

  • Jean Metzinger, c.1911, Nature morte, Compotier et cruche décorée de cerfs; Juan Gris, 1911, Study for Man in a Café; Marie Laurencin, c.1911, Testa ab plechs; August Agero, sculpture, Bust; Juan Gris, 1912, Guitar and Glasses, or Banjo and Glasses. Published in Veu de Catalunya, 25 April 1912

  • Umberto Boccioni, 1911, La rue entre dans la maison; Luigi Russolo, 1911, Gift d'une nuit. Published in Les Annales politiques et littéraires, one December 1912

  • Francis Picabia, paintings published in the New York Tribune, 9 March 1913. Picabia held his showtime 1-man testify in New York, Exhibition of New York studies by Francis Picabia, at 291 art gallery (formerly Piddling Galleries of the Photograph-Secession), March 17 - April 5, 1913

See also [edit]

  • Fourth dimension in art
  • Precisionism
  • Proto-Cubism
  • Rayonism
  • Section d'Or

References [edit]

  1. ^ Jean Metzinger, Note sur la peinture, Pan (Paris), Oct–November 1910
  2. ^ a b Christopher Green, MoMA collection, Cubism, Introduction, from Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2014-08-13 at the Wayback Machine
  3. ^ Cubism: The Leonard A. Lauder Collection, The Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 2014 Archived 2015-05-17 at the Wayback Auto
  4. ^ Christopher Greenish, MoMA drove Cubism, Origins and application of the term, from Grove Art Online, Oxford Academy Printing, 2009 Archived 2014-06-thirteen at the Wayback Machine
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l grand north o p q r Christopher Greenish, 2009, Cubism, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Printing Archived 2014-08-thirteen at the Wayback Machine
  6. ^ Joann Moser, Jean Metzinger in Retrospect, Pre-Cubist works, 1904–1909, The University of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press 1985, pp. 34–42
  7. ^ Hajo Düchting, Orphism, MoMA, Grove Fine art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009
  8. ^ Magdalena Dabrowski, Geometric Abstraction, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, The Metropolitan Museum of Fine art, New York, 2000
  9. ^ a b Christopher Dark-green, 2009, Cubism, Meanings and interpretations, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2015-07-02 at the Wayback Machine
  10. ^ Christina Lodder, 2009, Constructivism, Germination, 1914–21, MoMA, Grove Art Online, Oxford University Press, 2009 Archived 2008-10-24 at the Wayback Auto
  11. ^ Honour, H. and J. Fleming, (2009) A World History of Art. seventh edn. London: Laurence Male monarch Publishing, p. 784. ISBN 9781856695848
  12. ^ a b Douglas Cooper, "The Cubist Epoch", pp. 11–221, 232, Phaidon Press Limited 1970 in clan with the Los Angeles County Museum of Art and the Metropolitan Museum of Art ISBN 0-87587-041-four
  13. ^ a b c Cooper, 24
  14. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Exposition Braques, Gil Blas, fourteen November 1908, Gallica (BnF)
  15. ^ a b Danchev, Alex (March 29, 2007). Georges Braque: A Life. Penguin Books Limited. ISBN9780141905006 – via Google Books.
  16. ^ Futurism in Paris – The Advanced Explosion, Heart Pompidou, Paris 2008
  17. ^ Louis Vauxcelles, Le Salon des Indépendants, Gil Blas, 25 March 1909, Gallica (BnF)
  18. ^ D.-H. Kahnweiler. Der Weg zum Kubismus (Munich, 1920; Eng. trans., New York, 1949)
  19. ^ C. Greenberg. The Pasted-paper Revolution, ARTnews, 57 (1958), pp. 46–9, 60–61; repr. equally 'Collage' in Art and Culture (Boston, 1961), pp. seventy–83
  20. ^ Berger, John (1969). The Moment of Cubism . New York, NY: Pantheon. ISBN9780297177098.
  21. ^ a b "Fondation Gleizes, Chronologie (in French)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on November 12, 2008.
  22. ^ "Gil Blas / dir. A. Dumont". Gallica. March 18, 1910.
  23. ^ Daniel Robbins, Jean Metzinger: At the Eye of Cubism, 1985, Jean Metzinger in Hindsight, The Academy of Iowa Museum of Art, J. Paul Getty Trust, University of Washington Press
  24. ^ a b c Guillaume Apollinaire, Les Peintres cubistes: Méditations esthétiques (Paris, 1913)
  25. ^ "Eiffel Tower". The Guggenheim Museums and Foundation. Archived from the original on Feb 28, 2014.
  26. ^ "The Wild Men of Paris". www.architecturalrecord.com. Archived from the original on April 24, 2016.
  27. ^ a b "Eccentric Schoolhouse of Painting Increases Its Faddy in the Current Art Exhibition --- What Its Followers Attempt to Do". October 8, 1911. Archived from the original on March five, 2016 – via NYTimes.com.
  28. ^ a b "The "Cubists" Dominate Paris' Fall Salon, The New York Times, Oct 8, 1911 (Loftier-resolution PDF)" (PDF).
  29. ^ Philadelphia Museum of Art, Marcel Duchamp, Nude Descending a Staircase, No. 2 Archived 2017-09-eighteen at the Wayback Car
  30. ^ "Statens Museum for Kunst, National Gallery of Kingdom of denmark, Jean Metzinger, 1911–12, Woman with a Horse, oil on canvas, 162 × 130 cm". Archived from the original on Jan 15, 2012.
  31. ^ a b Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, University of Chicago Printing, 2008, pp. 293–295
  32. ^ Carol A. Hess, Manuel de Falla and Modernism in Kingdom of spain, 1898–1936, University of Chicago Press, 2001, p. 76, ISBN 0226330389
  33. ^ Commemoració del centenari del cubisme a Barcelona. 1912–2012, Associació Catalana de Crítics d'Art – ACCA
  34. ^ Mercè Vidal, L'exposició d'Art Cubista de les Galeries Dalmau 1912, Edicions Universitat Barcelona, 1996, ISBN 8447513831
  35. ^ David Cottington, Cubism in the Shadow of War: The Advanced and Politics in Paris 1905–1914, Yale Academy Press, 1998, ISBN 0300075294
  36. ^ "Exposició d'Art Cubista". Dalmau Galleries.
  37. ^ Joaquim Folch i Torres, Els Cubistes a cân Dalmau, Pàgina artística de La Veu de Catalunya Archived 2018-04-22 at the Wayback Machine (Barcelona) 18 April 1912, Any 22, núm. 4637–4652 (16–30 abr. 1912)
  38. ^ Joaquim Folch y Torres, "El cubisme", Pàgina Artística de La Veu, La Veu de Catalunya, 25 Apr 1912 (includes numerous articles on the artists and exhibition)
  39. ^ a b William H. Robinson, Jordi Falgàs, Carmen Belen Lord, Barcelona and Modernity: Picasso, Gaudí, Miró, Dalí, Cleveland Museum of Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art (New York), Yale University Press, 2006, ISBN 0300121067
  40. ^ Cubist caricature, Esquella de La Torratxa, Núm 1740 (3 maig 1912)
  41. ^ a b "[Exposició d'Art Cubista - Noticiero Universal]". Dalmau Galleries.
  42. ^ Jaime Brihuega, Las Vanguardias Artísticas en España 1909–1936, Madrid. Istmo.1981
  43. ^ "Le Journal". Gallica. October 5, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  44. ^ a b Periodical officiel de la République française. Débats parlementaires. Chambre des députés, 3 Décembre 1912, pp. 2924–2929. Bibliothèque et Archives de fifty'Assemblée nationale, 2012–7516 Archived 2015-09-04 at the Wayback Machine. ISSN 1270-5942
  45. ^ Patrick F. Barrer: Quand l'art du XXe siècle était conçu par les inconnus, pp. 93–101, gives an account of the argue.
  46. ^ "biography". www.peterbrooke.org.u.k.. Archived from the original on May 22, 2013.
  47. ^ "Albert-Gleizes-œuvre". September 18, 2007. Archived from the original on 2007-09-eighteen.
  48. ^ a b "The History and Chronology of Cubism, p. five". Archived from the original on March fourteen, 2013.
  49. ^ "La Section d'Or, Numéro spécial, 9 Octobre 1912". Archived from the original on April 3, 2017.
  50. ^ Cooper, twenty–27
  51. ^ a b c d e f g Robbins, Daniel (April 19, 1964). "Albert Gleizes, 1881-1953 : a retrospective exhibition". [New York : Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation] – via Cyberspace Archive.
  52. ^ Louis Chassevent, Les Artistes Indépendants, 1906, Quelques Petits Salons. Paris, 1908. Chassevent discussed Delaunay and Metzinger in terms of Signac'south influence, referring to Metzinger's "precision in the cut of his cubes..."
  53. ^ a b Robert Herbert, Neo-Impressionism, The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation, New York, 1968
  54. ^ A. Gleizes and J. Metzinger. Du "Cubisme", Edition Figuière, Paris, 1912 (Eng. trans., London, 1913)
  55. ^ "Mercure de French republic : série moderne / directeur Alfred Vallette". Gallica. December 1, 1912. Archived from the original on September 4, 2015.
  56. ^ a b Cottington, David (April 19, 2004). Cubism and Its Histories. Manchester Academy Press. ISBN9780719050046. Archived from the original on January 1, 2016 – via Google Books.
  57. ^ Christopher Green, Cubism and Its Enemies: Modern Movements and Reaction in French Art, 1916–1928 Archived 2016-01-01 at the Wayback Machine, Yale University Press, New Haven and London, 1987, ISBN 0300034687
  58. ^ "The Museum of Modern Fine art". Moma.org. Retrieved 2011-06-xi .
  59. ^ Kolokytha, Chara; Hammond, J.Thousand.; Vlčková, Lucie. "Cubism". Routledge Encyclopedia of Modernism.
  60. ^ Archive, Asia Art. "Cubism in Asia: Unbounded Dialogues – Report". aaa.org.hk . Retrieved 2018-12-22 .
  61. ^ Gris, Juan. "Portrait of Pablo Picasso". The Art Constitute of Chicago . Retrieved 2021-06-07 .
  62. ^ Pablo Picasso, 1909–10, Caput of a Woman, bronze, published in Umělecký Mĕsíčník, 1913 Archived 2014-03-03 at the Wayback Machine, Blue Mountain Project, Princeton University
  63. ^ Robert Rosenblum, "Cubism," Readings in Fine art History 2 (1976), Seuphor, Sculpture of this Century
  64. ^ Balas, Edith (Apr xix, 1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Modern Sculpture. American Philosophical Guild. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on January i, 2016 – via Google Books.
  65. ^ a b Architecture and cubism. Center canadien d'architecture/Canadian Heart for Architecture : MIT Press. April 19, 2002. OCLC 915987228 – via Open WorldCat.
  66. ^ a b c "The Drove | MoMA". The Museum of Modern Art. Archived from the original on Apr 5, 2012.
  67. ^ P. R. Banham. Theory and Design in the Kickoff Machine Age (London, 1960), p. 203
  68. ^ Choay, Françoise, le corbusier (1960), pp. ten–xi. George Braziller, Inc. ISBN 0-8076-0104-seven
  69. ^ "Albert Gleizes and Jean Metzinge, except from Du Cubisme, 1912" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June two, 2013.
  70. ^ La Maison Cubiste, 1912 Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Motorcar
  71. ^ Kubistische werken op de Armory Show Archived 2013-03-13 at the Wayback Machine
  72. ^ "Detail of Duchamp-Villon's Façade architecturale, 1913, from the Walt Kuhn Family papers and Armory Bear witness records, 1859-1984, bulk 1900-1949". www.aaa.si.edu. Archived from the original on March 14, 2013.
  73. ^ "Catalogue of international exhibition of mod art: at the Armory of the Sixty-ninth Infantry". Association of American Painters and Sculptors. April 19, 1913 – via Internet Annal.
  74. ^ Green, Christopher (January 1, 2000). Fine art in France, 1900-1940. Yale University Press. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on November 30, 2016 – via Google Books.
  75. ^ Dark-green, Christopher (2000). Joseph Csaky's staircase in the domicile of Jacques Doucet. ISBN0300099088. Archived from the original on 30 Apr 2016. Retrieved xviii Dec 2012.
  76. ^ Rex, Aestheticus (14 April 2011). "Jacques Doucet'southward Studio St. James at Neuilly-sur-Seine". Aestheticusrex.blogspot.com.es. Archived from the original on 27 March 2013. Retrieved 18 Dec 2012.
  77. ^ Imbert, Dorothée (1993). The Modernist Garden in France, Dorothée Imbert, 1993, Yale University Press. ISBN0300047169. Archived from the original on xxx April 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  78. ^ Balas, Edith (1998). Joseph Csáky: A Pioneer of Mod Sculpture, Edith Balas, 1998, p. five. ISBN9780871692306. Archived from the original on 30 April 2016. Retrieved 18 December 2012.
  79. ^ a b Boněk, Jan (2014). Cubist Prague. Prague: Eminent. p. 9. ISBN978-eighty-7281-469-5.
  80. ^ "Cubism". world wide web.czechtourism.com. CzechTourism. Archived from the original on xvi October 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  81. ^ "Cubist compages". www.radio.cz. Radio Prague. Archived from the original on 11 September 2015. Retrieved 1 September 2015.
  82. ^ a b c "Czech Cubism". world wide web.kubista.cz. Kubista. Archived from the original on 8 Oct 2015. Retrieved i September 2015.
  83. ^ Rexroth, Kenneth. "The Cubist Poetry of Pierre Reverdy (Rexroth)". Bopsecrets.org. Archived from the original on 2011-05-xix. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  84. ^ Reverdy, Pierre. "Title Page > Pierre Reverdy: Selected Poems". Bloodaxe Books. Archived from the original on 2011-05-27. Retrieved 2011-06-11 .
  85. ^ "Untitled Document". Archived from the original on 2007-08-thirteen. Retrieved 2008-04-07 .
  86. ^ Berger, John. (1965). The Success and Failure of Picasso. Penguin Books, Ltd. p. 73. ISBN 978-0-679-73725-iv.

Further reading [edit]

  • Alfred H. Barr, Jr., Cubism and Abstract Art, New York: Museum of Modernistic Art, 1936.
  • Cauman, John (2001). Inheriting Cubism: The Affect of Cubism on American Art, 1909–1936. New York: Hollis Taggart Galleries. ISBN0-9705723-iv-iv.
  • Cooper, Douglas (1970). The Cubist Epoch. London: Phaidon in clan with the Los Angeles County Museum of Fine art & the Metropolitan Museum of Fine art. ISBN0-87587-041-4.
  • Paolo Vincenzo Genovese, Cubismo in architettura, Mancosu Editore, Roma, 2010. In Italian.
  • John Golding, Cubism: A History and an Analysis, 1907-1914, New York: Wittenborn, 1959.
  • Richardson, John. A Life Of Picasso, The Cubist Rebel 1907–1916. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1991. ISBN 978-0-307-26665-1
  • Mark Antliff and Patricia Leighten, A Cubism Reader, Documents and Criticism, 1906–1914, The Academy of Chicago Press, 2008
  • Christopher Dark-green, Cubism and its Enemies, Modern Movements and Reaction in French Fine art, 1916–28, Yale Academy Printing, New Haven and London, 1987
  • Mikhail Lifshitz, The Crisis of Ugliness: From Cubism to Popular-Art. Translated and with an Introduction by David Riff. Leiden: BRILL, 2018 (originally published in Russian past Iskusstvo, 1968)
  • Daniel Robbins, Sources of Cubism and Futurism, Art Journal, Vol. 41, No. 4, (Winter 1981)
  • Cécile Debray, Françoise Lucbert, La Section d'or, 1912-1920-1925, Musées de Châteauroux, Musée Fabre, exhibition catalogue, Éditions Cercle d'art, Paris, 2000
  • Ian Johnston, Preliminary Notes on Cubist Architecture in Prague, 2004

External links [edit]

  • Cubism, Heilbrunn Timeline of Art History, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Cubism, Agence Photographique de la Réunion des musées nationaux et du Grand Palais des Champs-Elysées (RMN)
  • Czech Cubist Architecture
  • Cubism, Guggenheim Drove Online
  • Index of Historic Collectors and Dealers of Cubism, Leonard A. Lauder Inquiry Eye for Modern Art, Metropolitan Museum of Art
  • Elizabeth Carlson, Cubist Way: Mainstreaming Modernism later on the Armory, Winterthur Portfolio, Vol. 48, No. ane (Jump 2014), pp. one–28. doi:ten.1086/675687

kelsoposinever1937.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cubism

You may like these posts

Post a Comment for "Cubist Artists Were Particularly Inspired by Traditional Art From"